Is there a battle between S&OP and IBP?

In her post, “ENOUGH!”, Lora Cecere states that Integrated Business Planning (IBP) and Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) are in a “battle of acronyms” and that this “holy war cannot be won”. I agree, let’s not get stuck on names. At the same time, the S&OP/IBP debate is a happy consequence of the fact that S&OP remains a living organism that is maturing quickly. Firms like Oliver Wight and Aberdeen Group have lobbied for the adoption of the new term, IBP. The push to change the name is meant to highlight the importance of adding new elements to the S&OP equation such as demand sensing and steering, financial integration, robust modeling and scenario planning, and profitable demand and supply decision making.

At Steelwedge, we agree that IBP developments are fast becoming imperatives and that S&OP must not be viewed as a mere supply chain activity but as a strategic management process that considers all elements of the business across a 24-month planning horizon. In fact, by its current definition, many of our S&OP customers are enjoying the full benefits of best-in-class IBP with the help of our technology. Although we see IBP as a logical next step for many companies practicing S&OP, we remain focused on helping our clients design, automate and support processes that are the “right fit” for their business. Adherence to best practices and industry norms is important, but we recognize that some companies can meet their goals with entry-level S&OP while others operating in highly complex and competitive markets may require much more.

Despite the occasional confusion, we see the enthusiasm of business practitioners, consultants and technology providers as a hopeful indicator for long-term prospects of S&OP/IBP. Avoid the war and get on board with S&OP, IBP or whatever you want to call it!

Is the “Arnold Palmer of S&OP” on Your Sales Team?

golfAre you struggling with motivating your sales people to invest the effort required to create accurate forecasts?  We reached into our archives to unearth a creative way that you can put the competitive sales spirit to work for the benefit of your S&OP process — and have fun along the way too.  Devised by Dr. Kenneth Kahn, professor of marketing and director of the da Vinci Center for Innovation at Virginia Commonwealth University, Forecasting Golf brings the fun of golf into the forecasting process, motivating team members to elevate their “game”.

The game’s goal is for an individual player to score the lowest forecast error for the year. A year-long round consists of 12 monthly “holes” that are scored during each forecasting cycle. Attractive prizes are awarded at the end of the game to those who have achieved the lowest scores (i.e., the most accurate forecasts) to reward participation and focus attention on the importance of minimizing forecast error.

Dr. Kahn stresses the benefits of translating statistical language into more understandable form. For instance, a forecast error of 15% does not readily convey if this error acceptable or not. However, when the same forecast is referred to as “par,” then everyone in the company including other department and management levels can readily interpret that error as being acceptable.

Monthly groupings of sales people into scrambles can further enhance the game by offering someone not doing very well year-to-date the chance to still win, and thus, stimulate players to continue their participation in the monthly forecasting effort.

Rules of the Game

True to the game of golf, Dr. Kahn uses the terms eagle, birdie, par and bogey to describe the possible scores for each hole or forecast period.  The terms describe a forecast’s proximity to actual sales where eagle is extremely close, if not perfect, birdie is very close, par is within an acceptable region of error and bogey is beyond an acceptable region of error.

The baseline forecasts provided by the forecaster serve as par and are typically based on a weighted mean absolute percent error (MAPE). The baseline is distributed to the sales force for adjustment wherein each sales person can accept the statistical forecast or make an adjustment up or down. A player could hold par simply by agreeing to the baseline. The benefit of this is 1) it forces a player to think twice about making adjustments, and 2) it builds credibility for the planner as he/she becomes the focal point of the forecasting process. Ultimately, a sales person should only adjust the baseline forecast if they can improve the number rather than out of a desire to create excess inventory or sandbag for the sake of quota.

The following is the scoring methodology. You can change the particulars to suit your company’s goals.

  • Eagle = a score of one. Defined as a weighted MAPE of less than 2.5% and less than the given baseline forecast.
  • Birdie = a score of two. Defined as a weighted MAPE of more than 2.5% but less than the given baseline forecast.
  • Birdie = a score of three. This is defined as within 5% of the given baseline forecast’s weighted MAPE.
  • Bogey = a score of four. This is defined as greater than 5% of the given baseline forecast’s weighted MAPE and less than 10% of the given baseline forecast’s weighted MAPE.
  • Double Bogey = a score of five.  This is defined as greater than 10% of the given baseline forecast’s weighted MAPE and less than 20% of the given baseline forecast’s weighted MAPE.
  • Triple Bogey = a score of five.  This is defined as greater than 20% of the given baseline forecast’s weighted MAPE.

Yearly awards can be given to the lowest overall score as well as second place, third place and honorable mentions. Forecasting Golf can also include “closest-to-the-pin” during the year (i.e., the person who had the lowest weighted MAPE for a month over the course of the year.)

Extra game components you may want to create could include scorecards and an overall game board. After the first year, handicaps could be considered to even the playing field for those having to forecast products that are highly volatile (e.g., a handicap could be easily calculated by using the standard deviation of actual sales.)

Read the original Journal of Business Forecasting article here.

Has S&OP Evolved Beyond “S&OP”? – A Perspective on the S&OP vs. IBP Debate

The rapid evolution of S&OP from best practice to standard practice has sparked a vigorous debate about how best to define and describe the process as it continues to mature. It’s become apparent that although many companies have adopted S&OP generally, there are many different flavors in existence today. Meanwhile, some especially innovative companies have pushed S&OP beyond its traditional scope to support strategic decision making alongside operational planning.

This reality has lead firms like Oliver Wight and Aberdeen Group among others to lobby for the adoption of a new term – Integrated Business Planning (IBP). The push to change the name is meant to highlight the importance of adding new elements to the S&OP equation such as demand sensing and steering, financial integration, robust modeling and scenario planning, and profitable demand and supply decision making.

At Steelwedge, we agree that IBP developments are fast becoming imperatives and that S&OP must not be viewed as a mere supply chain activity but as a strategic management process that considers all elements of the business across a 24-month planning horizon. In fact, by its current definition, many of our S&OP customers are enjoying the full benefits of best-in-class IBP with the help of our technology. Although we see IBP as a logical next step for many companies practicing S&OP, we remain focused on helping our clients design, automate and support processes that are the “right fit” for their business.  Adherence to best practices and industry norms is important, but we recognize that some companies can meet their goals with entry-level S&OP while others operating in highly complex and competitive markets may require much more.

The IBP debate is a happy consequence of the fact that S&OP remains a living organism that is maturing at the speed of business.  Despite the occasional confusion, it’s impossible not to see the enthusiasm shared among business practitioners, consultants and technology providers as a hopeful indicator for long-term prospects of S&OP/IBP.

New Year, New Appreciation for S&OP

New Year's ResolutionsAt the start of a New Year, I like to pause to recognize that turning the page in my calendar presents a rare chance to turn over a new leaf. Like many of you, I kicked off 2011 full of resolve to make simple changes that I expect will enhance my health, happiness and productivity. As the holiday season fades into memory however, it’s easy to feel the zeal for making change slipping away as well.

This year, knowing that personal and professional satisfaction can be closely linked, I figured a new approach was in order. Whether you want to get in shape or make more time for loved ones, good habits at work can go a long way toward setting you up for success in your personal life.

Take for example the work that we all do with Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP). Yes, if you’re not as obsessed with S&OP as us, it’s easy to minimize it as simply a “work thing” with little bearing on who we are as individuals. But, my years working alongside our customers suggest otherwise. As far-fetched as it may sound, improving communication, collaboration and decision making is good medicine not only for the business but for the people involved too. Just think about how you feel leaving a meeting that was efficient and constructive versus one that was not. I’ve seen first-hand how a well-run business process like S&OP can create positive feelings about work that in turn send people home each day feeling energized.

Personally, the enthusiasm that springs from job satisfaction makes it far easier for me to find my way to an elliptical machine or to make a special trip to the farmer’s market for the fruits and vegetables that I know I should eat. So this year, as you set out to accomplish your resolutions, take a close look at how your professional and personal performance can intersect. A few improvements on the job could have a powerful ripple effect that could make 2011 one of your best years yet.

Happy New Year!

Glen Margolis

Follow me on Twitter!