Is Your S&OP “Glocal” Enough?

As organizations grapple with today’s multinational environment, and look to increasingly take more business processes global, numerous opportunities and pitfalls present themselves. Steelwedge recently explored these dynamics in a webinar entitled “The Pursuit of Growth: Is Your S&OP Glocal Enough?” The webinar was presented by Chris Turner, the co-founder of StrataBridge Consulting, and Nari Viswanathan, the VP of Product Management and Product Marketing at Steelwedge.

Early on in the webinar, Chris stated, “There is no one best practice approach for global S&OP. If anyone tries to sell you the ‘17 Steps to Perfect Global S&OP,’ you should definitely throw them out of your office.” This statement set a tone for the presentation, which offered principles to guide attendees’ thinking and help them avoid unintended cognitive traps around taking their sales and operations planning process global. Chris laid out a framework that strategy, innovation, and operations serve as fundamental laws that need to be recognized in any business decision-making.

What, exactly, does it mean to be “glocal”? The term was coined by Japanese economists in the 1980s, and refers to the simultaneity –the co-presence–of both universalizing and particularizing tendencies. As we all increasingly become global citizens, at the same time, our need to be different is heightened. Global and local are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they enable each other. It’s this unique balance that helps businesses find their way in diverse markets while trying to drive the economies of scale and the economies of scope and speed that come with size.

So what are the biggest cognitive traps and biases of going global? Chris outlined these:

A reluctance to admit complexity: A manager’s job is to cut through the complexity, get to the point, and rally people around it. But in a desire to do that, we often not only don’t want to admit to complexity, we end up being blind to it.

The desire to “jump to ‘algorithm’”: As humans, we like things to be neat, predictable, reliable, and repeatable. As you start to move into new territories, new channels, new geographies, new markets, however, some of your algorithmic roles that you’re carrying with you may not fit. You need to back off a little bit and being prepared to have a bit of trial and error and learn by doing.

Mechanistic approach: If you approach global business purely through process and technology, and you leave out the organic, or the “people part” of the equation, you will never be successful. In most cases, when moving into new territories, the cultural angle is much bigger than you expect.

The “duplication” trap: If you have an S&OP process in place at the country level, and you just repeat that process as you move into multiple countries, you will ultimately end up duplicating data and effort. Some of these decisions should be made at a different level.

How does a company ensure that it doesn’t fall prey to any of these traps when they embark on global expansion? According to Chris, these are the five key principles for strategic execution of global S&OP:

  1. Everyone has a good idea of the decisions for which he or she is responsible.
  2. Important information about the competitive environment gets to headquarters quickly.
  3. Once made, decisions are rarely second-guessed.
  4. Information flows freely across organizational boundaries.
  5. Employees have the information they need to understand the bottom-line impact of their day-to-day choices.

Blueprint for delivering on the five key principles for global S&OP

To ensure that a company can execute on these principles for successful global expansion, Nari advocated for developing a “blueprint” that is flexible and can adapt to local challenges. This blueprint is a fundamental technology enabler, which allows for a standard process, but also can have configurations created that are flexible to the local environment. Nari stated that in many of such engagements, Steelwedge leads the initial processes of scoping, design and implementation, and customers become involved at the validation and deployment stage.

“Adoption of blueprints is not purely a process issue but also a technology issue,” Nari said. “True blueprints are atomic and leveragable across not only companies in the same industry but also across industries.”

In future deployments or enhancements with these customers, the customer takes the lead and Steelwedge takes a backseat. “Getting truly globalized requires the company, through its own leadership activity, to look forward to future deployments for the solution,” Nari said.

You can learn more about becoming “glocal” by viewing the archived webinar here.

What is your experience with the challenges and opportunities inherent in taking your business global while keeping local concerns in mind? We’d love to hear from you in the comments!

S&OP and Simplicity for “Steve”: Getting it Right

Nari Viswanathan | Steelwedge Software Inc.

Last week, Lora Cecere penned a piece in her Supply Chain Shaman blog post about a conversation with a Mining company executive, “Steve.”  He called for her advice on S&OP technology as he was equally hamstrung between limited Excel scalability and his IT team’s edict to leverage their Oracle ERP investment—which was not meeting his flexibility needs.

Lora’s message was twofold: technology is becoming more and more important to powering the S&OP process; and it is more and more challenging to understand which solutions are the best fit for each company’s unique needs. For real analysis of supply/demand tradeoffs, it’s the right time for S&OP technology, but how can providers help companies get it right?

At Steelwedge we’ve spent a decade partnering with leaders across the Global 1,000 to help them optimize their planning around unique business requirements and complexities.  And we’ve also seen a set of similarities in their needs.  “Steve the Miner” has technology needs that are similar to those from “Jane the CPG manufacturer”, “Frank the Consumer Electronics retailer” and most other manufacturing company planning leaders.  These characteristics include:

a)  A gap between IT and Line of Business technology requirements

b)  A desire to leverage Excel-based solutions for S&OP

c)  A challenge to model tradeoffs between supply, demand and finance

d)  A lack of an adequate data model to power decision-making

We agree with Lora that finding the right vendor who understands how to meet both your unique and more universal S&OP needs can’t be done in just a conference room or via a PowerPoint presentation.  First, you must be able to clearly articulate your technology expectations; a challenge for many companies since the S&OP process may not be well defined.

Once you have your expectations defined, the best way to simplify the technology selection process is to test drive the technology—with YOUR data.  Steelwedge pioneered S&OP Test Drives a number of years ago. Since then, dozens of our customers have been able to upload a set of their key master, product, history, order, and inventory data into our secure cloud-based Data Center to see their S&OP data in action.  And to break the technology selection Gordian knot with IT.

Steelwedge Software | S&OP cloud–based technology

In the spirit of this holiday shopping season, why not simplify your S&OP technology selection process—get it right—and “try before you buy?”

 

 

 

 

 

Guest Perspective: Peter Bolstorff Answers Your Questions

A recent Agility Series webinar with Supply Chain author, Peter Bolstorff on the
7 Principles of Highly Effective Planning drove more questions than there was time to answer.

The highly attended, interactive webinar highlighted that successful supply chain planning is not just a function of “doing more” leading practices. The best supply chain planning organizations have picked appropriate leading practices as dictated by the markets they serve – integrating those practices with their chosen technology platform to achieve competitive advantage. Actionable research from Peter’s project experience suggests that, in addition to S&OP, the best supply chain planning organizations have adopted seven principles:

  1. Systematic management of “master data”
  2. Synchronized S&OP, tactical planning, and execution processes and horizons
  3. Mature collaborative processes for  key customers and suppliers alike – reconciling forecast,
    orders, and yearly volume
  4. Data-oriented understanding of the inputs to the forecast
  5. Intense focus on “point-of-sale” or “sell through” data (versus sales orders and “sell in”)
  6. Disciplined product lifecycle management process
  7. A continuous improvement approach to understanding consumer or user behavior.

Following are a few  follow-up questions from the webinar with perspective our webiner host and this week’s guest blogger, Peter Bolstorff:

1)      What is the net impact of forecast error that drives the importance of accuracy?  In one of my recent projects, the business improved its forecast error (MAPE) measured at a 90 day offset from 49% to 19% over nine months.  Service improved seven points from 92% to 99%, excess inventory decreased by 25%, factory costs decreased by 10%, lead-time decreased by 15%, revenue grew by 10%, and cuts to retailer orders virtually went to zero.

 

2)      What are the main S&OP Improvement Measures and Goals?  Companies that have developed mature S&OP processes have both customer and internal facing measures.  The most popular include delivery performance, forecast error (MAPE), lead-time, overall inventory turns, excess and obsolete inventory as a percent to the total.  Common aspirational goals include 99% perfect line fulfillment and 15% SKU weighted MAPE.  Lead-time, inventory turns, and excess and obsolete are dependent on markets, sourcing strategy, and competition.

 Stay tuned for more on this topic with input from co-host of this session, Ed Lewis.

What questions AREN’T you answering with S&OP today?

The good news: 87% of companies see S&OP as key to driving better agility and growth in a tumultuous business climate. And, the average enterprise has at least five S&OP initiatives in play to handle better balance of supply/demand/ finance. These initiatives cross multiple dimensions including: business units, product families and geographies.

The bad news: Without a connected, collaborative view of S&OP across the enterprise, companies are leaving some pivotal business questions unanswered.

Following are a few questions you should be answering today as well as some perspective on the risk– or cost– of not getting them on your company’s radar. Are you answering the right questions today?

1. What is the variance between my revenue forecast, budget and compensation target by service line?

Cost of not knowing: inability to understand how much of budget should be allocated for each service line; and understanding which service lines are truly improving company performance vs. which are impeding company performance

2. How much revenue does each business unit expect to earn in the coming quarter?

Cost of not knowing: ineffective trade promotion budget allocation. In CPG industries if the revenue projection of each business unit is available then the optimal allocation of trade promotion funds can be made. In high-tech manufacturing environments, allocation of inventory can be done based on expected business unit performance. For instance: either upselling in high performing units vs. storing inventory at component level (rather than finished goods) level for poor performing business units

3. Which Business Units’ forecasts are above corporate plan?

Cost of not knowing : limited availability and awareness of the financial impact associated with the business unit forecast. For example, those BUs that have consistently not met forecasts and if they have provided current forecasts that are above corporate plan implies a level of risk that the executive management team has to understand. The key challenge with existing solutions is that they are designed to be operational supply chain planning tools rather than providing an executive S&OP dashboard with operational and financial metrics.
4. What is the variance between my forecast product revenue and my compensation target?

Cost of now knowing: misaligned commissions structure. For sales organizations , compensation is mainly based on commissions and meeting forecasted sales. Having direct visibility of the variance between forecast product revenue and compensation target will provide positive motivation for the sales force to meet targets versus if the information is not readily available in operational supply chain planning tools This kind of data is usually resident in CRM systems like Siebel or SalesForce.com. It is important for the S&OP solution to provide integrated visibility to sales performance and how it ties to operational performance.

5. Do any business units predict significantly more or less revenue than last quarter? Why?

Cost of not knowing: the potential to miss budgetary and AOP targets. If there is a revenue reduction trend that exists then it is important to know this as soon as possible so that corrective measures can be taken. Revenue is a mix of price and volumes. It is important to know if one unit predicts significantly more or less revenue than previous quarter, why so? This question, in turn sparks more follow ups, such as: Is it because of poor sales or is it because of poor pricing? What is the current margin at the product family level for current quarter versus last quarter? Have there been seasonal factors resulting in reduced volumes? Are there quality issues forcing reduction in volumes?

While good S&OP practices answer supply and demand balancing at either a corporate or a departmental level, great S&OP can take a much tighter look at interdependencies, sort out root causes and impact across both departmental as well as corporate S&OP Processes.  What questions aren’t you answering with S&OP? Let us know.

Linking Tactical Performance with Executive Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP)

Too often, I’ve noticed a disconnect between an executive sales and operations planning (S&OP) process and the tactical, execution-level implementation of the plan. For example, the operations staff lacks the executive sponsorship necessary to provide input on process improvements or executive S&OP plans are not communicated to the tactical team for implementation. How do you reconcile S&OP strategy with tactical execution?

We see that companies are either too focused on execution without consideration of strategy or have a disconnected strategic  and execution oriented process. In today’s situation, this is not sufficient.

Ideally, companies should adopt a continuous Sales and Operations planning process that spans the strategic & operational horizon. The company should also integrate the execution process tightly to obtain feedback in both directions and ensure that plans are actually converted into viable action. It may so happen that the execution may vary greatly from the plan, it is fine if that is the case, but only if the reasons are clearly understood. Continue reading