Got a Unique S&OP Process? There’s an App for That

Is part of your company’s competitive advantage captured in unique processes and KPIs that you can’t manage in your planning systems? Like your smartphone, your business’s planning system should enable business planners, partners, and others to build simple “apps” on top of it. These apps should enable you to embed and scale your unique capabilities and processes, and rapidly evolve them as your business and its needs change.

To learn about the possibilities that apps can bring to the sales and operations planning (S&OP) process, join Steelwedge on Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 9:00 am PDT for the webinar “Got a Unique S&OP Process? There’s an App for That.” Dr. Blake Johnson, Stanford educator and supply chain innovator, will discuss the growing imperative to implement and scale differentiating planning capabilities. Dr. Johnson will share the benefits of an S&OP foundation that can be easily augmented – and automated – with emerging best-practice processes for your company’s otherwise unique “off-line” processes.

Register and attend the webinar to learn:

  • How to identify opportunities to leverage a planning system to accommodate inevitable changes in your business
  • How to connect and scale your company’s “secret sauce” processes with your planning system
  • Examples of emerging best-practice planning apps: range forecasting, segmentation, demand policy and stocking strategy
  • How to implement iPhone-like apps on your S&OP platform to not only support, but flex with your company’s processes

We hope to “see” you at the webinar! In the meantime, let us know in the comments what unique processes you want to capture in your S&OP process.

What Do S&OP and Football Have in Common?

The requirements for successfully conducting business today are not unlike the qualities that a football team needs to be triumphant on the gridiron. Both face diverse and aggressive competition. Both require the agility to make adjustments mid-stream, in response to changing requirements and environmental dynamics. And both must use historical information to make decisions while also anticipating what will happen in the future.

Applying what we know about winning on the football field to find success in the sales and operations planning (S&OP) process served as the topic of a recent Supply Chain Digest article authored by Steelwedge CEO Glen Margolis. In the article, Glen outlines five strategies that both S&OP and football teams must take to win:

  1. You have to know—and play—your role
  2. Establish a common goal—and communicate regularly about it
  3. Have a plan—and a contingency plan
  4. Ensure your equipment employs state-of-the-art technology
  5. Manage by the metrics

Ultimately, on the football field or in S&OP, winning requires leadership, visibility, teamwork, accountability, and agility. Click here to learn more about the best-practice parallels that Glen draws between S&OP and football. Do you have any other comparisons that you can add to the list? Let us know in the comments!

Is Your S&OP “Glocal” Enough?

As organizations grapple with today’s multinational environment, and look to increasingly take more business processes global, numerous opportunities and pitfalls present themselves. Steelwedge recently explored these dynamics in a webinar entitled “The Pursuit of Growth: Is Your S&OP Glocal Enough?” The webinar was presented by Chris Turner, the co-founder of StrataBridge Consulting, and Nari Viswanathan, the VP of Product Management and Product Marketing at Steelwedge.

Early on in the webinar, Chris stated, “There is no one best practice approach for global S&OP. If anyone tries to sell you the ‘17 Steps to Perfect Global S&OP,’ you should definitely throw them out of your office.” This statement set a tone for the presentation, which offered principles to guide attendees’ thinking and help them avoid unintended cognitive traps around taking their sales and operations planning process global. Chris laid out a framework that strategy, innovation, and operations serve as fundamental laws that need to be recognized in any business decision-making.

What, exactly, does it mean to be “glocal”? The term was coined by Japanese economists in the 1980s, and refers to the simultaneity –the co-presence–of both universalizing and particularizing tendencies. As we all increasingly become global citizens, at the same time, our need to be different is heightened. Global and local are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they enable each other. It’s this unique balance that helps businesses find their way in diverse markets while trying to drive the economies of scale and the economies of scope and speed that come with size.

So what are the biggest cognitive traps and biases of going global? Chris outlined these:

A reluctance to admit complexity: A manager’s job is to cut through the complexity, get to the point, and rally people around it. But in a desire to do that, we often not only don’t want to admit to complexity, we end up being blind to it.

The desire to “jump to ‘algorithm’”: As humans, we like things to be neat, predictable, reliable, and repeatable. As you start to move into new territories, new channels, new geographies, new markets, however, some of your algorithmic roles that you’re carrying with you may not fit. You need to back off a little bit and being prepared to have a bit of trial and error and learn by doing.

Mechanistic approach: If you approach global business purely through process and technology, and you leave out the organic, or the “people part” of the equation, you will never be successful. In most cases, when moving into new territories, the cultural angle is much bigger than you expect.

The “duplication” trap: If you have an S&OP process in place at the country level, and you just repeat that process as you move into multiple countries, you will ultimately end up duplicating data and effort. Some of these decisions should be made at a different level.

How does a company ensure that it doesn’t fall prey to any of these traps when they embark on global expansion? According to Chris, these are the five key principles for strategic execution of global S&OP:

  1. Everyone has a good idea of the decisions for which he or she is responsible.
  2. Important information about the competitive environment gets to headquarters quickly.
  3. Once made, decisions are rarely second-guessed.
  4. Information flows freely across organizational boundaries.
  5. Employees have the information they need to understand the bottom-line impact of their day-to-day choices.

Blueprint for delivering on the five key principles for global S&OP

To ensure that a company can execute on these principles for successful global expansion, Nari advocated for developing a “blueprint” that is flexible and can adapt to local challenges. This blueprint is a fundamental technology enabler, which allows for a standard process, but also can have configurations created that are flexible to the local environment. Nari stated that in many of such engagements, Steelwedge leads the initial processes of scoping, design and implementation, and customers become involved at the validation and deployment stage.

“Adoption of blueprints is not purely a process issue but also a technology issue,” Nari said. “True blueprints are atomic and leveragable across not only companies in the same industry but also across industries.”

In future deployments or enhancements with these customers, the customer takes the lead and Steelwedge takes a backseat. “Getting truly globalized requires the company, through its own leadership activity, to look forward to future deployments for the solution,” Nari said.

You can learn more about becoming “glocal” by viewing the archived webinar here.

What is your experience with the challenges and opportunities inherent in taking your business global while keeping local concerns in mind? We’d love to hear from you in the comments!

What questions AREN’T you answering with S&OP today?

The good news: 87% of companies see S&OP as key to driving better agility and growth in a tumultuous business climate. And, the average enterprise has at least five S&OP initiatives in play to handle better balance of supply/demand/ finance. These initiatives cross multiple dimensions including: business units, product families and geographies.

The bad news: Without a connected, collaborative view of S&OP across the enterprise, companies are leaving some pivotal business questions unanswered.

Following are a few questions you should be answering today as well as some perspective on the risk– or cost– of not getting them on your company’s radar. Are you answering the right questions today?

1. What is the variance between my revenue forecast, budget and compensation target by service line?

Cost of not knowing: inability to understand how much of budget should be allocated for each service line; and understanding which service lines are truly improving company performance vs. which are impeding company performance

2. How much revenue does each business unit expect to earn in the coming quarter?

Cost of not knowing: ineffective trade promotion budget allocation. In CPG industries if the revenue projection of each business unit is available then the optimal allocation of trade promotion funds can be made. In high-tech manufacturing environments, allocation of inventory can be done based on expected business unit performance. For instance: either upselling in high performing units vs. storing inventory at component level (rather than finished goods) level for poor performing business units

3. Which Business Units’ forecasts are above corporate plan?

Cost of not knowing : limited availability and awareness of the financial impact associated with the business unit forecast. For example, those BUs that have consistently not met forecasts and if they have provided current forecasts that are above corporate plan implies a level of risk that the executive management team has to understand. The key challenge with existing solutions is that they are designed to be operational supply chain planning tools rather than providing an executive S&OP dashboard with operational and financial metrics.
4. What is the variance between my forecast product revenue and my compensation target?

Cost of now knowing: misaligned commissions structure. For sales organizations , compensation is mainly based on commissions and meeting forecasted sales. Having direct visibility of the variance between forecast product revenue and compensation target will provide positive motivation for the sales force to meet targets versus if the information is not readily available in operational supply chain planning tools This kind of data is usually resident in CRM systems like Siebel or SalesForce.com. It is important for the S&OP solution to provide integrated visibility to sales performance and how it ties to operational performance.

5. Do any business units predict significantly more or less revenue than last quarter? Why?

Cost of not knowing: the potential to miss budgetary and AOP targets. If there is a revenue reduction trend that exists then it is important to know this as soon as possible so that corrective measures can be taken. Revenue is a mix of price and volumes. It is important to know if one unit predicts significantly more or less revenue than previous quarter, why so? This question, in turn sparks more follow ups, such as: Is it because of poor sales or is it because of poor pricing? What is the current margin at the product family level for current quarter versus last quarter? Have there been seasonal factors resulting in reduced volumes? Are there quality issues forcing reduction in volumes?

While good S&OP practices answer supply and demand balancing at either a corporate or a departmental level, great S&OP can take a much tighter look at interdependencies, sort out root causes and impact across both departmental as well as corporate S&OP Processes.  What questions aren’t you answering with S&OP? Let us know.

Raise a Cup of Kindness

As we exit another wild, unpredictable year filled with economic, political and environmental upheaval—resulting in changes wrought of inspiration, desperation and perspiration, a virtual salute.

Indeed, as a global community there is much to be lauded, much to be learned and much to be leery from 2011. Cultural revolutions from the Middle East to Wall Street to Main Street; regional economic fissures, that have produced a global network of fiscal fault lines; and a heaping helping of Mother Nature’s wrath have both threatened and united us. It is the same in our industry, where finance, sales and operations teams are increasingly aligning to better recognize, respond and recalibrate to these same global dynamics. We are all learning the lessons of better alignment and agility in our ability to thrive.

Like it or not, VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity), is our “new normal.” Nassim Nicholas Taleb, the author of one of my favorite books, The Black Swan, explores the idea that an event—positive or negative—that is deemed improbable, like the appearance of a Black Swan, can cause massive consequences.

I am inspired by what I’ve seen in 2011 from our customers, from our peers and from our Steelwedge team in approaching and resolving their own Black Swans. I’ve seen 100-year-old businesses face recession-driven loss in demand, and realign to come out tighter, stronger and better; I’ve seen consumer electronics powerhouses stare down the reality of ever-shortening product lifecycles with laser-focus on smart new product development; I’ve seen a Phoenix rise from the ashes of the automotive industry through powerful focus and improved management; I’ve seen manufacturers rebound after losing a supplier of 90% of a core part in the devastating tsunami; and I’ve seen hard choices made clearer, and sooner with better empirical data.

So, though we may not know the next Black Swan coming just around the corner in 2012, I raise a cup of kindness to what we’ve seen, what we’ve done and who we’ve met that have changed us for the better in 2011.

We too have paddled in the stream,
from morning sun till dine;
But seas between us broad have roared
since auld lang syne.
And there’s a hand my trusty friend!
And give us a hand o’ thine!
And we’ll take a right good-will draught,
for auld lang syne.