<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Perspectives on Sales &#38; Operations Planning &#187; steelwedge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/tag/steelwedge/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog</link>
	<description>Best Practices in Sales and Operations Planning (S&#38;OP)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Combating Complexity: Are You Agile Enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/combating-complexity-are-you-agile-enough-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/combating-complexity-are-you-agile-enough-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nari Viswanathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[expert advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated Business Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales & Operations Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative planning and forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated business planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steelwedge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/?p=1334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/media/uploads/2011/12/nariv2.jpg"></a>As the world grapples this month with the ripples from Europe’s debt  crisis, the political turmoil in the Middle East, and the flooding in  Asia, companies can’t ignore the imperative to plan for all those  scenarios they’d never want to plan for. But have you?</p>
<p>What used to be an annual spreadsheet event is no longer an option  for global businesses that have to navigate and course correct for the  daily onslaught of economic, political and environmental events that  could derail the best laid plans.</p>
<p>Supply chain complexity is multiplying as businesses become more  global and interconnected.  To remain competitive, organizations are  changing how they source , sell and develop products. The rate of  product obsolescence in consumer electronics market alone puts business  agility to the test.  Add to that the disruption and risk that is part  of the volatile global marketplace, and business leaders recognize that  the “new normal” is likely nothing like last year…or even last month.   Agility is imperative; and it is keeping business leaders up at night.</p>
<p>Next week, On December 7th, I look forward to leading a discussion at the <a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/news/details.php?relid=116" target="_blank">Supply Chain and Logistics Summit</a> in Dallas in a workshop  I will be presenting there:  “S&#38;OP:   Enabling Agility and Flexibility in a Global Organization.”  Sales and  Operations Planning is the ammunition companies require today to combat  complexity, respond to market events faster and manage risks.  In this  session, we will look at how companies need to create an S&#38;OP plan,  ensure that it is executed well so that the desired business performance  is obtained to gain profits. In other words, S&#38;OP is not only about  the strategy but also about how the strategy can be executed.</p>
<p>I hope to see you in Dallas at my session or at the Steelwedge booth  ,#9, to&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/media/uploads/2011/12/nariv2.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1337" title="nariv" src="http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/media/uploads/2011/12/nariv2.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="100" /></a>As the world grapples this month with the ripples from Europe’s debt  crisis, the political turmoil in the Middle East, and the flooding in  Asia, companies can’t ignore the imperative to plan for all those  scenarios they’d never want to plan for. But have you?</p>
<p>What used to be an annual spreadsheet event is no longer an option  for global businesses that have to navigate and course correct for the  daily onslaught of economic, political and environmental events that  could derail the best laid plans.</p>
<p>Supply chain complexity is multiplying as businesses become more  global and interconnected.  To remain competitive, organizations are  changing how they source , sell and develop products. The rate of  product obsolescence in consumer electronics market alone puts business  agility to the test.  Add to that the disruption and risk that is part  of the volatile global marketplace, and business leaders recognize that  the “new normal” is likely nothing like last year…or even last month.   Agility is imperative; and it is keeping business leaders up at night.</p>
<p>Next week, On December 7th, I look forward to leading a discussion at the <a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/news/details.php?relid=116" target="_blank">Supply Chain and Logistics Summit</a> in Dallas in a workshop  I will be presenting there:  “S&amp;OP:   Enabling Agility and Flexibility in a Global Organization.”  Sales and  Operations Planning is the ammunition companies require today to combat  complexity, respond to market events faster and manage risks.  In this  session, we will look at how companies need to create an S&amp;OP plan,  ensure that it is executed well so that the desired business performance  is obtained to gain profits. In other words, S&amp;OP is not only about  the strategy but also about how the strategy can be executed.</p>
<p>I hope to see you in Dallas at my session or at the Steelwedge booth  ,#9, to understand how you are addressing  business agility in your  organization. But even if you can’t be in Dallas, we&#8217;d like to hear from  you on what agility issues keep you up at night.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/combating-complexity-are-you-agile-enough-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steelwedge Secures $16 Million Investment to Accelerate Growth</title>
		<link>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/steelwedge-secures-16-million-investment-to-accelerate-growth.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/steelwedge-secures-16-million-investment-to-accelerate-growth.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen Margolis, Founder &#38; CEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Business Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales & Operations Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated business planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s&op best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and operations planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software as a service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steelwedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/?p=1241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I’m <a title="Glen Margolis, live!" href="http://www.steelwedge.com/sw_videos/index.php?z=glen_margolis_090711" target="_blank">very pleased to announce</a> that Steelwedge has reached an important milestone today in our growth as a company.  We’ve received a $16 million growth equity investment led by <a href="http://www.mainsailpartners.com/">Mainsail Partners</a>, accelerating our efforts to serve our rapidly expanding customer base while continuing to build breakthrough sales and operations planning (S&#38;OP) and integrated business planning (IBP) products.</p>
<p>It was important to find an equity partner that could help us beyond simply providing capital.  Jason Payne and his Mainsail team have a strong track record helping “boot strapped” companies evolve into world-class companies.  They have a wealth of operational expertise working with next generation software providers and bring to bear an extensive network of technology professionals.</p>
<p>This investment will help us to facilitate global sales growth and ensure seamless support to our current portfolio of global customers. Our customers will have access to the leading edge technology, including an enhanced IBP platform. I’m especially pleased that Mainsail’s strategic vision complements our long-time goal of building best-in-class solutions that exceed the expectations of our customers.</p>
<p>Read the press release here: <a href="../../news/details.php?relid=109">http://www.steelwedge.com/news/details.php?relid=109</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m <a title="Glen Margolis, live!" href="http://www.steelwedge.com/sw_videos/index.php?z=glen_margolis_090711" target="_blank">very pleased to announce</a> that Steelwedge has reached an important milestone today in our growth as a company.  We’ve received a $16 million growth equity investment led by <a href="http://www.mainsailpartners.com/">Mainsail Partners</a>, accelerating our efforts to serve our rapidly expanding customer base while continuing to build breakthrough sales and operations planning (S&amp;OP) and integrated business planning (IBP) products.</p>
<p>It was important to find an equity partner that could help us beyond simply providing capital.  Jason Payne and his Mainsail team have a strong track record helping “boot strapped” companies evolve into world-class companies.  They have a wealth of operational expertise working with next generation software providers and bring to bear an extensive network of technology professionals.</p>
<p>This investment will help us to facilitate global sales growth and ensure seamless support to our current portfolio of global customers. Our customers will have access to the leading edge technology, including an enhanced IBP platform. I’m especially pleased that Mainsail’s strategic vision complements our long-time goal of building best-in-class solutions that exceed the expectations of our customers.</p>
<p>Read the press release here: <a href="../../news/details.php?relid=109">http://www.steelwedge.com/news/details.php?relid=109</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/steelwedge-secures-16-million-investment-to-accelerate-growth.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there a battle between S&amp;OP and IBP?</title>
		<link>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/is-there-a-battle-between-sop-and-ibp.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/is-there-a-battle-between-sop-and-ibp.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Blair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Business Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales & Operations Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated business planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s&op best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&OP software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steelwedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/?p=1110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In her post, <a href="http://www.supplychainshaman.com/supply-chain-planning/enough/">“ENOUGH!”, </a>Lora Cecere states that Integrated Business Planning (IBP) and Sales and Operations Planning (S&#38;OP) are in a “battle of acronyms” and that this “holy war cannot be won”. I agree, let’s not get stuck on names. At the same time, the S&#38;OP/IBP debate is a happy consequence of the fact that S&#38;OP remains a living organism that is maturing quickly. Firms like Oliver Wight and Aberdeen Group have lobbied for the adoption of the new term, IBP. The push to change the name is meant to highlight the importance of adding new elements to the S&#38;OP equation such as demand sensing and steering, financial integration, robust modeling and scenario planning, and profitable demand and supply decision making.</p>
<p>At Steelwedge, we agree that IBP developments are fast becoming imperatives and that S&#38;OP must not be viewed as a mere supply chain activity but as a strategic management process that considers all elements of the business across a 24-month planning horizon. In fact, by its current definition, many of our S&#38;OP customers are enjoying the full benefits of best-in-class IBP with the help of our technology. Although we see IBP as a logical next step for many companies practicing S&#38;OP, we remain focused on helping our clients design, automate and support processes that are the “right fit” for their business. Adherence to best practices and industry norms is important, but we recognize that some companies can meet their goals with entry-level S&#38;OP while others operating in highly complex and competitive markets may require much more.</p>
<p>Despite the occasional confusion, we see the enthusiasm of business practitioners, consultants and technology providers as a hopeful indicator for long-term prospects of S&#38;OP/IBP. Avoid the war and get on board with S&#38;OP, IBP or whatever you want to call it!</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her post, <a href="http://www.supplychainshaman.com/supply-chain-planning/enough/">“ENOUGH!”, </a>Lora Cecere states that Integrated Business Planning (IBP) and Sales and Operations Planning (S&amp;OP) are in a “battle of acronyms” and that this “holy war cannot be won”. I agree, let’s not get stuck on names. At the same time, the S&amp;OP/IBP debate is a happy consequence of the fact that S&amp;OP remains a living organism that is maturing quickly. Firms like Oliver Wight and Aberdeen Group have lobbied for the adoption of the new term, IBP. The push to change the name is meant to highlight the importance of adding new elements to the S&amp;OP equation such as demand sensing and steering, financial integration, robust modeling and scenario planning, and profitable demand and supply decision making.</p>
<p>At Steelwedge, we agree that IBP developments are fast becoming imperatives and that S&amp;OP must not be viewed as a mere supply chain activity but as a strategic management process that considers all elements of the business across a 24-month planning horizon. In fact, by its current definition, many of our S&amp;OP customers are enjoying the full benefits of best-in-class IBP with the help of our technology. Although we see IBP as a logical next step for many companies practicing S&amp;OP, we remain focused on helping our clients design, automate and support processes that are the “right fit” for their business. Adherence to best practices and industry norms is important, but we recognize that some companies can meet their goals with entry-level S&amp;OP while others operating in highly complex and competitive markets may require much more.</p>
<p>Despite the occasional confusion, we see the enthusiasm of business practitioners, consultants and technology providers as a hopeful indicator for long-term prospects of S&amp;OP/IBP. Avoid the war and get on board with S&amp;OP, IBP or whatever you want to call it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/is-there-a-battle-between-sop-and-ibp.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Mutant S&amp;OP Terms</title>
		<link>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/top-10-mutant-sop-terms.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/top-10-mutant-sop-terms.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Blair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales & Operations Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s&op best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&OP terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steelwedge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top down forecasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/?p=1053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Looking back over the year that was 2010, I jotted down several terms which struck me as interesting twists on some familiar terms.  Some of these twists were intentional mutations while others were totally unintentional.  My favorites tend to be of the unintended variety.  Here’s my Top 10 S&#38;OP list of terms from 2010:</p>
<p>10.  <strong>Key Performance Medics</strong>:  Specially trained analysts who come to the rescue to turn around poor performance indicators</p>
<p>9.   <strong>Strategery</strong>:  a plan, approach, line of attack (very similar to strategy)</p>
<p>8.   <strong>Regression Forecasting</strong>:  Reverting to an earlier, more accurate forecast to give the impression of better forecasting</p>
<p>7.   <strong>Imperial Forecasting</strong>:  The ultimate Top Down forecast, dictated by the ruler of the kingdom</p>
<p>6.   <strong>Reactive demand shaping</strong>:  coming up with a marketing promotion during the month in which additional sales are needed rather than planning ahead as part of an overall strategy (or Strategery)</p>
<p>5.   <strong>Tough Luck Capacity Planning</strong>:  Similar to Rough Cut Capacity Planning; however, with Tough Luck, capacity is fixed so the supply plan drives the demand plan</p>
<p>4.   <strong>New Product Insanity</strong>:  The attempt to forecast new product launch dates</p>
<p>3.   <strong>Higher Keys</strong>:  Rooted in the data structure concept of hierarchies, this mutation is the idea that key groups are formed through aggregation</p>
<p>2.   <strong>Moving Adage Forecast</strong>:  A twist on moving average, continually changing forecast caused by management mood swings</p>
<p>And the number 1 term…</p>
<p>1.    <strong>Disaggravation</strong>:  The Steelwedge disaggregation functionality which enables users to enter forecasts at higher levels of aggregation, reducing the number entries and thus, reducing user aggravation.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking back over the year that was 2010, I jotted down several terms which struck me as interesting twists on some familiar terms.  Some of these twists were intentional mutations while others were totally unintentional.  My favorites tend to be of the unintended variety.  Here’s my Top 10 S&amp;OP list of terms from 2010:</p>
<p>10.  <strong>Key Performance Medics</strong>:  Specially trained analysts who come to the rescue to turn around poor performance indicators</p>
<p>9.   <strong>Strategery</strong>:  a plan, approach, line of attack (very similar to strategy)</p>
<p>8.   <strong>Regression Forecasting</strong>:  Reverting to an earlier, more accurate forecast to give the impression of better forecasting</p>
<p>7.   <strong>Imperial Forecasting</strong>:  The ultimate Top Down forecast, dictated by the ruler of the kingdom</p>
<p>6.   <strong>Reactive demand shaping</strong>:  coming up with a marketing promotion during the month in which additional sales are needed rather than planning ahead as part of an overall strategy (or Strategery)</p>
<p>5.   <strong>Tough Luck Capacity Planning</strong>:  Similar to Rough Cut Capacity Planning; however, with Tough Luck, capacity is fixed so the supply plan drives the demand plan</p>
<p>4.   <strong>New Product Insanity</strong>:  The attempt to forecast new product launch dates</p>
<p>3.   <strong>Higher Keys</strong>:  Rooted in the data structure concept of hierarchies, this mutation is the idea that key groups are formed through aggregation</p>
<p>2.   <strong>Moving Adage Forecast</strong>:  A twist on moving average, continually changing forecast caused by management mood swings</p>
<p>And the number 1 term…</p>
<p>1.    <strong>Disaggravation</strong>:  The Steelwedge disaggregation functionality which enables users to enter forecasts at higher levels of aggregation, reducing the number entries and thus, reducing user aggravation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/top-10-mutant-sop-terms.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information Overload: Filtering for Expert S&amp;OP Advice</title>
		<link>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/information-overload-filtering-for-expert-sop-advice.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/information-overload-filtering-for-expert-sop-advice.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Corin Goodwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demand Forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales & Operations Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Sales Forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative sales planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated business planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measuring forecast accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s&op best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and operations planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Forecasting and Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steelwedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/?p=1028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There’s  a lot of really good information out there about S&#38;OP, supply chain  management, demand forecasting, business intelligence… but you’re busy.  You’re probably too busy to keep up with everything. Seriously – do you  have time to read the scores of books and journals and blogs that  promise to fill you in on everything? Somehow, you need to find a way to  filter out what you need to know, which is the best advice, and what  really isn’t worth the free download.  There are some <a href="http://steelwedge.com/bestpractices/index.php?z=industry_resources">terrific resources</a> out there, if you know where to look. Sometimes, however, the most  obvious filter is to go straight to the top of the field. A few words  from the acknowledged experts addressing the most important questions of  the day can save you a lot of time and money.</p>
<p>Along  these lines, some of our folks have posted thought-provoking  discussions with <a href="http://www.altimetergroup.com/about/about-lora-cecere-partner">Lora Cecere</a>, a  partner with Altimeter Group, and <a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/sw_videos_bjohnson/">Blake Johnson</a>, a Stanford University  professor, on our website. These are <a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/bestpractices/index.php?z=sop_masterclass">short videos in a series</a> –  you only have to listen to what you need to know <em>right now</em>.  You can always come back for other topics. Yes, we’re going to ask you  to register once, but after that it’s a free ride.  In the series’ first  installment, Lora Cecere discusses the business challenges that are  driving S&#38;OP adoption. You’ll learn why Lora has concluded that  companies with strong S&#38;OP processes and tools are flourishing in  today&#8217;s economy, and in fact, are able to sense changes in demand five  times faster than their competitors. Lora is a partner with Altimeter  Group and is known as a supply chain visionary who understands  technology. She brings seven years of industry analyst expertise coupled  with two decades of manufacturing, marketing and software expertise.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s  a lot of really good information out there about S&amp;OP, supply chain  management, demand forecasting, business intelligence… but you’re busy.  You’re probably too busy to keep up with everything. Seriously – do you  have time to read the scores of books and journals and blogs that  promise to fill you in on everything? Somehow, you need to find a way to  filter out what you need to know, which is the best advice, and what  really isn’t worth the free download.  There are some <a href="http://steelwedge.com/bestpractices/index.php?z=industry_resources">terrific resources</a> out there, if you know where to look. Sometimes, however, the most  obvious filter is to go straight to the top of the field. A few words  from the acknowledged experts addressing the most important questions of  the day can save you a lot of time and money.</p>
<p>Along  these lines, some of our folks have posted thought-provoking  discussions with <a href="http://www.altimetergroup.com/about/about-lora-cecere-partner">Lora Cecere</a>, a  partner with Altimeter Group, and <a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/sw_videos_bjohnson/">Blake Johnson</a>, a Stanford University  professor, on our website. These are <a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/bestpractices/index.php?z=sop_masterclass">short videos in a series</a> –  you only have to listen to what you need to know <em>right now</em>.  You can always come back for other topics. Yes, we’re going to ask you  to register once, but after that it’s a free ride.  In the series’ first  installment, Lora Cecere discusses the business challenges that are  driving S&amp;OP adoption. You’ll learn why Lora has concluded that  companies with strong S&amp;OP processes and tools are flourishing in  today&#8217;s economy, and in fact, are able to sense changes in demand five  times faster than their competitors. Lora is a partner with Altimeter  Group and is known as a supply chain visionary who understands  technology. She brings seven years of industry analyst expertise coupled  with two decades of manufacturing, marketing and software expertise.  She knows her stuff!</p>
<p>In the series’ second installment, Blake Johnson, Ph.D. explains  how leading companies are incorporating demand and supply uncertainty  into their S&amp;OP process to overcome the challenge of demand  volatility. You’ll learn why Blake encourages leading companies to  forecast a range of potential demand so that managers can confidently  evaluate trade-offs to achieve the optimal level of supply chain  flexibility. A consulting professor at Stanford University, Blake is an  internationally recognized expert in the field of supply chain risk and  flexibility.</p>
<p>These  are the first videos in our <a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/bestpractices/index.php?z=sop_masterclass">S&amp;OP Master Class series</a>. We hope  you’ll find them helpful and informative. We’re doing our best to get  information out there, but if there’s something specific that you need,  let us know and we’ll see what we can do!</p>
<p>Explore <a href="http://www.steelwedge.com">Steelwedge Software</a> to get the best advice with just a little effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/information-overload-filtering-for-expert-sop-advice.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For S&amp;OP to be successful, do all functional areas of organization need to have the same goals/objectives?</title>
		<link>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/for-sop-to-be-successful-do-all-functional-areas-of-organization-need-to-have-the-same-goalsobjectives.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/for-sop-to-be-successful-do-all-functional-areas-of-organization-need-to-have-the-same-goalsobjectives.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Blair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales & Operations Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative planning and forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive S&OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated business planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s&op best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steelwedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/?p=963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/media/uploads/2010/11/rope1.jpg"></a>S&#38;OP presents many challenges to business enterprises to implement and sustain a world-class S&#38;OP process. One common thread is the need for effective collaboration. What sounds simple, in general terms, is often difficult when the details come into play. Details may include different goals and incentives for disparate functional groups and individuals and inadequate tools to facilitate meaningful collaboration.</p>
<p>Functional groups have unique goals and performance indicators. Sales may be driven to achieve high revenue targets while the Operations group may focus on minimizing labor costs and inventory levels. Finance seeks to manage cash flow, minimize costs and maximize profit. Units of measure may differ from one functional group to the next. Some plan in units, others in dollars. Forecast horizons can vary from current quarter to planning horizon to fiscal multiple year projections.</p>
<p>The key point here is NOT that all groups and individuals should share the same focus and effort. To the contrary, best practice enterprises heavily leverage the unique talents of their employees. Sales sells and Operations drives the supply chain. That said, it is critical that the enterprise has a single, consensus plan that is feasible and all parties agree to execute against that plan. Companies that fail to achieve one agreed plan, are prone to falling well short of optimal inventory levels, customer service targets, availability of desired inventory and company financial goals. A less tangible, but very important by-product of a missing consensus plan is a culture that pits individuals and groups against one another rather than acting as a cohesive team.</p>
<p>From my work at Steelwedge with several clients, it’s been very pleasing to see how the Steelwedge tool promotes cross-functional interaction. Users exchange quantitative and qualitative inputs in an environment that pulls together information in a way that had not previously been&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/media/uploads/2010/11/rope1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-969" src="http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/media/uploads/2010/11/rope1-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a>S&amp;OP presents many challenges to business enterprises to implement and sustain a world-class S&amp;OP process. One common thread is the need for effective collaboration. What sounds simple, in general terms, is often difficult when the details come into play. Details may include different goals and incentives for disparate functional groups and individuals and inadequate tools to facilitate meaningful collaboration.</p>
<p>Functional groups have unique goals and performance indicators. Sales may be driven to achieve high revenue targets while the Operations group may focus on minimizing labor costs and inventory levels. Finance seeks to manage cash flow, minimize costs and maximize profit. Units of measure may differ from one functional group to the next. Some plan in units, others in dollars. Forecast horizons can vary from current quarter to planning horizon to fiscal multiple year projections.</p>
<p>The key point here is NOT that all groups and individuals should share the same focus and effort. To the contrary, best practice enterprises heavily leverage the unique talents of their employees. Sales sells and Operations drives the supply chain. That said, it is critical that the enterprise has a single, consensus plan that is feasible and all parties agree to execute against that plan. Companies that fail to achieve one agreed plan, are prone to falling well short of optimal inventory levels, customer service targets, availability of desired inventory and company financial goals. A less tangible, but very important by-product of a missing consensus plan is a culture that pits individuals and groups against one another rather than acting as a cohesive team.</p>
<p>From my work at Steelwedge with several clients, it’s been very pleasing to see how the Steelwedge tool promotes cross-functional interaction. Users exchange quantitative and qualitative inputs in an environment that pulls together information in a way that had not previously been available. Beyond data visibility, users are gathering field input, validating assumptions and driving an enterprise plan rather than multiple, isolated departmental plans.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, solutions depend on people, process and technology. If the process and the technology facilitate collaboration, the people become more productive…and happier, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steelwedge.com/blog/for-sop-to-be-successful-do-all-functional-areas-of-organization-need-to-have-the-same-goalsobjectives.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

